Strong Nonprofits - Strong Communities

Welcome

About Us

Join

Nonprofit Links

Observing Nonprofits
   July 2004

The 2004 Nonprofit Leadership Conference -- sponsored by:

Alliance of Nonprofits for Insurance

Clark Nuber

Davis Wright Tremaine

Safeco

The Seattle Foundation

 

Agility: Leading Nimble Nonprofits

The Tenth Annual Nonprofit Leadership Conference: April 1, 2004.  Meydenbauer Center, Bellevue

To receive a notice for the 11th Annual Conference by email, please send a note with your name and email address to conference@tess.org


Responding to the New Climate of Scrutiny

Notes by Trisha Mattieu

Panelists: Teresa Moore, Moore Ink; Laverne Woods, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

 Laverne Woods about

  • Causes of scrutiny
  • Types of scrutiny
  • Proactive things from a legal perspective to do in order to fare well when scrutiny occurs

 

The Changing Climate for Nonprofits

Post-Enron Governance Standards

Scrutiny by the Media

  • Nationally: Boston Globe, Forbes, Wall Street Journal, Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • Locally: Puget Sound Business Journal, The Post Intelligencer, The Oregonian
  • Over the last year and ½ calls from media have gone up exponentially.

Legislative Scrutiny

  • H.R. 7 in 2003, CARE Act
  • Rep. Thomas: Ways & Means hearings
  • Senate hearings on credit counseling

Scrutiny by Regulators

  • Internal Revenue Services. Soft audit telephone calls have stepped up.
  • Federal Trade Commission. The FTC gets involved especially in charitable solicitations.
  • State Attorneys General/Department of Justice. The AG office in WA State is currently staffed with very good, thoughtful people.

Anti-Terrorist Initiatives post 9/11:

What You Can Do

  • Self-Assessment
  • Written Policies
  • Pro-Active PR

Self-Assessment

  • Does the board have adequate training/knowledge regarding their fiduciary obligations? If a board member is uncomfortable with board duties, they should not accept the job. They have responsibilities and need training since the “buck stops with the board”.
  • Is the board or a committee with board-delegated powers exercising oversight over all major activities?
  • Are board decisions documented in minutes? This is very important. It is easy for the board to get sloppy here. Ensure minutes have enough—but also not too much. Think of the minutes as notes that may be made public.
  • How does each program/activity relate to your mission? One place here where boards can get in trouble is having to pay federal tax on income unrelated to the original mission.
  • Are any board members related to each other, or to any staff? There are many ways to do this appropriately, but a conflict of interest policy must be in place. Relations should not be involved in each other’s compensation, for example.
  • Are there any loans outstanding to officers or directors? This is ILLEGAL in WA State.
  • How is executive compensation established and approval documented? Need to have a policy for how executive compensation is determined.
  • Is there a system in place for tracking donor restrictions on gifts and compliance with restrictions? Must have good record keeping here.

Written Policies

  • Conflict of Interest Policy. Should be tailored for needs of particular board.
    • Board and senior management
    • Annual questionnaire
    • Follow it!
  • Executive Compensation Policy
    • Tax law “Intermediate Sanctions”
    • Independent comparability data
    • Approval by independent board or committee
    • Documentation in written minutes
  • Employment—The most common lawsuits are HERE. Make sure you get legal counsel on what types of policies to have in writing.
    • Hiring practices: discrimination, testing, background checks
    • Pitfalls and liabilities of employee handbooks
    • Updating policies is essential
    • Termination
  • Endowment Policies
    • Compliance with Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act. This tells how much you can and cannot spend of endowment. This has been a big issue with the economic downturn. Many cannot spend endowment until it is worth more than when it came in.
    • Investment policy’
    • Spending policy
    • Tracking system for donor restrictions
  • Gift Acceptance Policies
    • Consistent gift documents
    • Avoiding “expensive gifts” (such as land that you later find to be on an environmental hazard)

Fundraising Pit Falls

  • Credibility with Donors
  • Is your organization registered in all states where you solicit funds?
    • Unified Registration Statement: www.multistatefiling .org
  • Do you solicit funds through your website?
  • Madison v. Telemarketing Associates, 2003 Supreme Court case
    • States can prevent solicitation sfrom implying tha a substantial portion of contributions go to charity when it does not.
  • Federal Trade Commission “Operation Phony Philanthropy”—law enforcement and education
  • Red flags for IRS: games of chance, car donations, thriftshop goods for sale by for-profits.

Proactive PR: Tax Reporting

  • Annual tax returns Form 990 and 900PF (private foundations) are public documents.
  • Ease of access with Guidestar.org
  • Importance of Guidestar summaries: information comes from Form 990
  • Open invitation to tell your story: program successes, numbers served, and future goals
  • Compensation to board, executives and highly paid employees/independent contractors
  • Consider legal review

Teresa Moore: Media Relations

What happens if your organization makes a mistake and the media comes calling…

Case Study: YWCA was recently in the news after an employee of theirs shot and killed his girlfriend on March 17, 2004 at the Miller Community Center in Seattle. The man was then killed by police officers. The reason YWCS was in the news had nothing to do with the murder.  The media discovered that the man had been a registered sex offender, so the question became why had YWCA hired a sex offender?

YWCA found out about this man’s history and responded before it even hit the news. The man had been hired through another organization, Labor Ready, who they assumed had the same screening standards that they did. They were horrified to find this out and fired Labor Ready right away. They had immediately taken the following steps:

  • Got the facts
  • Notified their staff and board
  • Consulted with PR Counsel (Teresa Moore)
  • Designated a media spokesperson
  • Developed a public statement.

This was the best way they could have handled the situation. They did not need to respond to a negative op-ed written because their side of the story got out. The number 1 thing is to ensure your side gets heard!

YWCA has thousands of donors but did not have a single communication from anyone about this incident. Why? Because they have good communication with their donors all the time.

Rules for Effective Crisis Communications

There are five states of a crisis: Detection, prevention/preparation, containment, recovery and learning. Communication is a key part of each and every stage. Most importantly, good crisis communications can be the difference between an organization’s survival or demise after a crisis occurs.

Rule #1: Communicate effectively all the time.

Rule #2: Have a plan. A crisis communication plan. You can get examples of good plans off the Internet, purchase university textbooks on how to develop them, or hire a professional PR firm to assist you.

Rule #3: Express concern. The first response is often to clam up. But you can and should say something in a crisis and not saying something is the kiss of death in a crisis. Accept responsibility. Tell them what you’re going to do in the future. There is always some measure of concern that can be expressed without putting yourself or your organization in a precarious legal position.

Rule #4: Never ignore the media.  There are three types of responses to a media during a crisis:

  • We know and here’s all the information
  • We don’t know everything now. Here’s what we know. We’ll find out more and let you know.
  • We have no idea, but we’ll find out and tell you.

Rule #5: Handle the media wisely. Identify key spokespeople in your organization and then provide them with media training.

If someone from the media asks technical questions, it’s okay to say “I want to make sure I get everything to you correctly. Let me get that to you in writing”.

 

 

Return to the front page of the July 2004 Observing Nonprofits [[[...click here.]]]

The Evergreen State Society
PO Box 20682

Seattle, WA 98102-0682
206-329-5640
:: info@tess.org

This site is hosted by eskimo.com  


© 2004, The Evergreen State Society, Seattle, Washington, USA